In this documentary, has done his way to the general public, he has already become a big stir among hardcore creationists and Darwinists. special interest groups have sought to pressure theaters not to show films on the film. Hate mail has even death threats, a percentage of those who have gone to its position on creationism. Ben Stein is a famous actor in the twilight of his career he was also a target for hostility to advocacyCreationism in the film. Film critic Roger Moore Orlando Sentinel deliberately avoided signing a confidentiality agreement, which was adopted to maintain. He screened the film and decided to write a negative review on it.
This film has the degree of exposure to any complaint, and associated with peer pressure. Additionally, you receive a valid point in the core of the challenge. Darwinists have against the effects of this film would be afraid ofQuestioning evolution. You see, as Christians believe ultimately in the Bible, evolutionists believe in the ultimate authority on everything that comes from neo-Darwinism.
One of the main criticisms of the film and creationism in general, argued that there was no science involved only religious ideas. Nothing is further from the truth. Let's say for the sake of argument, that a man goes to you and tells you that it can produce a ball of energyAir and this source of energy would grow up in all sorts of things, such as changing the structures and chemicals. "Are you serious?" would most likely be the answer. But in this case the man is dead serious about his claim. Most people, including creationists and evolutionists would laugh in disbelief at the idea. As Christians we believe that only faith to believe in witchcraft and the man has no power to produce energy out of nothing. One might think that Darwinism is impossible.
However,Evolution takes two steps forward that statement. He says that the beginning of the universe came from nothing by chance. By eliminating God, or an intelligent being, maintains that the human sciences from the point of view. But in reality, the appearance of something is to create from nothing supernatural. Given that defies the laws of physics. How can a humanist assumptions begin with supernatural means? The answer is, can not, and never with a neo-Darwinian appropriate scientificExplanation happens to produce energy from nothing to create the Big Bang.
On the other hand, creationism is due to two fundamental laws ...
The first law of thermodynamics
Defines energy as a mass that can not be created from nothing, and can be changed from one form to another, but the total amount remains unchanged.
The second law of thermodynamics
All systems tend toward the most mathematically probable state, and finallytotally random and disorganized. Albert Einstein said this law would be impossible to eliminate.
If you agree with the statements or not, you can use science to discredit evolution, the idea of intelligent design promotes. This is what the film tries to say that is what is upsetting some neo-Darwinists. Not to bring religion to say, during the debate, as if it were a bad idea to do that during the public school system, with so many different points of viewChristianity and the influence of interest groups, but it takes a fundamentally different view of science that deals with a different conclusion. After this film is available in April as the average person can only be a trailer for the film, it will be interesting how the public reacts to the challenge of Darwinism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment